Haraldmerckelbach.nl
Depersonalization Experiences in Undergraduates Are
Related to Heightened Stress Cortisol Responses
Timo Giesbrecht, PhD, Tom Smeets, MSc, Harald Merckelbach, PhD, and Marko Jelicic, PhD
vealed clinically highly relevant findings, relatively little is
Abstract: The relationship between dissociative tendencies, as mea-
known about the more proximal mechanisms involved in
sured with the Dissociative Experiences Scale and its amnesia,
absorption/imaginative involvement, and depersonalization/dereal-
One line of research that might shed light on proximal
ization subscales, and HPA axis functioning was studied in 2
mechanisms involved in dissociation is the one directed at
samples of undergraduate students (N ⫽ 58 and 67). Acute stress
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis functioning in de-
was induced by means of the Trier Social Stress Test. Subjective and
personalization disorder (DPD; Simeon et al., 2001; Stanton
physiological stress (i.e., cortisol) responses were measured. Indi-
et al., 2001). Unfortunately, the 2 studies that investigated the
viduals high on the depersonalization/derealization subscale of the
matter yielded conflicting results. Stanton et al. (2001) found
Dissociative Experiences Scale exhibited more pronounced cortisol
a trend toward lower basal cortisol levels of patients with
responses, while individuals high on the absorption subscale showed
DPD when compared with individuals with major depressive
attenuated responses. Interestingly, subjective stress experiences, as
disorder. However, the authors acknowledge that HPA axis
indicated by the Tension-Anxiety subscale of the Profile of Mood
dysfunction "may be more sensitively detected by examining
States, were positively related to trait dissociation. The present
of the response of the HPA axis to provocation challenge"
findings illustrate how various types of dissociation (i.e., deperson-
(Stanton et al., 2001, p. 88). In line with this suggestion,
alization/derealization, absorption) are differentially related to cor-
Simeon et al. (2001) evaluated HPA axis functioning in DPD
tisol stress responses.
by means of a low-dose dexamethasone administration.
Key Words: Dissociation, acute stress, cortisol response, Trier
These authors showed that DPD is associated with HPA axis
Social Stress Test.
dysregulation. More specifically, DPD was found to be re-lated to diminished negative feedback control of cortisol. The
(J Nerv Ment Dis 2007;195: 282–287)
authors also found that DPD patients have elevated levels ofplasma cortisol. Interestingly, these findings are in starkcontrast to the dysregulations encountered in individuals
Dissociative experiences include subjective phenomena suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In
like derealization, absorption, and memory complaints.
PTSD, such dysregulations are often characterized by
In their mild form, such experiences are quite common in the
enhanced negative feedback (Stein et al., 1997; Yehuda et
normal population (e.g., Ross et al., 1991). Yet, they are
particularly pronounced in certain diagnostic categories (e.g.,
Findings of Simeon et al. (2001) suggest that persistent
depersonalization disorder, borderline personality disorder; post-
dissociation, and especially the depersonalization component
traumatic stress disorder; schizophrenia; see, e.g., Holmes et al.,
of dissociation, should be associated with diminished nega-
2005; Merckelbach et al., 2005). Although there is an im-
tive feedback control of cortisol. Therefore, we expect dis-
pressive amount of literature on the topic of dissociation,
sociative tendencies to be related to heightened levels of
researchers in this domain have primarily focused on the
cortisol following a stressor. However, their study did not
alleged traumatic etiology of dissociative experiences (see for
include a stressor. The goal of the present study was therefore
a review, Giesbrecht and Merckelbach, 2005; Kihlstrom,
to investigate the relationship between dissociative tenden-
2005). Although research on distal antecedents (i.e., dysfunc-
cies and HPA axis functioning in a nonclinical sample under
tional family environment) related to dissociation has re-
conditions of acute stress. Given that the dissociative symp-toms typical for clinical groups have their low-intensitycounterparts in the general population (Bernstein and Put-
Department of Experimental Psychology, Maastricht University, The Neth-
nam, 1986; Leonard et al., 1999), we recruited a nonclinical
sample. In doing so, we hoped to exclude the confounding
This study was supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for
Scientific Research (to N.W.O., grant number 402-01-088-D).
influence of comorbidity on HPA axis functioning. To induce
Send reprint requests to Timo Giesbrecht, PhD, Department of Experimental
stress, we exposed undergraduate students to the Trier Social
Psychology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht,
Stress Test (TSST; Kirschbaum et al., 1993). With this
The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected].
laboratory task, acute stress can be induced in a reliable way.
Copyright 2007 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
On the basis of the Simeon et al. (2001) results, we expected
higher levels of trait dissociation generally, and the deper-
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease • Volume 195, Number 4, April 2007
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease • Volume 195, Number 4, April 2007
Dissociation and Acute Stress
sonalization/derealization subscale of the Dissociative Expe-
"annoyed," "angry," and "grumpy" for the subscale Anger-
riences Scale (DES) in particular, to go along with heightened
Hostility and "nervous," "tensed," and "panicky" for the
levels of cortisol following the stressor. The relationship
Tension-Anxiety subscale. Total scores for the 2 subscales
between the cortisol response and pathological dissociation,
were calculated by adding up all item scores. The POMS has
as measured by the Dissociative Experiences Scale Taxon
excellent psychometric properties (Lezak, 2004; Wald and
(Waller et al., 1996), and the other facets of dissociative
Mellenberg, 1990).
experiences, notably absorption and amnesia, will also beinvestigated.
Trier Social Stress Test
The TSST (Kirschbaum et al., 1993) combines both
social and cognitive stress. It consists of 3 stages, each lasting
5 minutes: a preparation period, a free speech, and a mental
arithmetic task. Thus, participants are first told to prepare aspeech for a job interview, which they subsequently have to
give. After the speech, a mental arithmetic task is adminis-
Participants were 58 undergraduate students enrolled at
tered. Every time the participant makes an error, she/he has to
Maastricht University. Twenty-nine of them were women.
Their mean age was 19.93 years (SD ⫽ 3.33; range, 17– 41
start over. The participants are aware of the fact that both the
years). Participants suffering from cardiovascular diseases,
speech and the mental arithmetic task are videotaped and
endocrine disorders, or who were taking medication were
observed by the experimenter. The participant has to remain
excluded from the study. Participants gave written consent
standing during these 2 last stages. The TSST is a reliable
prior to taking part and were compensated through a small
method to induce psychological stress in the laboratory (see
amount of money. Participants were asked to refrain from
Kirschbaum and Hellhammer, 1994) and was found to pro-
eating, drinking, and smoking for at least 1 hour prior to the
voke the most pronounced physiological (cortisol) reaction as
beginning of the testing session. The study was approved by
compared with other stress induction procedures (Dickerson
the standing ethical committee of the Faculty of Psychology,
and Kemeny, 2004).
Participants were tested individually in our laboratory
Dissociative Experiences Scale (Bernstein and Putnam,
with the experimenter present. All experimental sessions took
1986, Cronbach's alpha ⫽ 0.92). The DES is a self-report
place in the afternoon (between 14:00 and 17:00 hours) to
scale asking respondents to indicate on 100 mm Visual-
reduce variability in the cortisol response due to fluctuations
Analogue Scales to what extent they experience 28 dissocia-
of cortisol levels over the day (Kirschbaum and Hellhammer,
tive phenomena in daily life. Examples of such phenomena
1994). Participants first completed the DES. Next, prema-
include feelings of depersonalization, derealization, and psy-
nipulation cortisol levels were sampled and participants com-
chogenic amnesia. In their meta-analytic study, van IJzen-
pleted the first POMS. Then, participants were exposed to the
doorn and Schuengel (1996) provided evidence for the sound
TSST (Kirschbaum et al., 1993). Immediately after the TSST,
psychometric properties of the DES. A subset of 8 DES items
a second cortisol sample was obtained, and the POMS was
forms the Dissociative Experiences Scale Taxon (DES-T;
readministered. A third and fourth cortisol sample were taken
Cronbach's alpha ⫽ 0.67; Waller et al., 1996). This taxon is
20 and 40 minutes after the TSST, respectively (see e.g.,
thought to be especially sensitive to pathological dissociation.
Smeets et al., in press).
DES-T scores can be obtained by averaging across DES items3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 22, and 27 (e.g., Eisen and Carlson, 1998).
Saliva Sampling and Free Cortisol Analysis
In addition to the DES-T, separate subscale scores
Cortisol data were obtained using Salivettes (Sarstedt,
were also calculated following the 3-factor solution pro-
Nu¨mbrecht, Germany). Salivettes are small cotton swabs on
posed by Ross et al. (1995), Sanders and Green (1994), and
which participants gently chew for a 1-minute period. Next,
Carlson et al. (1991). These were amnesia (Cronbach's
the swab is put into a small plastic tube. Immediately upon
alpha ⫽ 0.81), absorption and imaginative involvement(Cronbach's alpha ⫽ 0.83), and depersonalization and
collection, the uncentrifuged saliva samples were stored at
derealization (Cronbach's alpha ⫽ 0.66).
⫺40°C. Salivary-free cortisol levels were determined in du-plicate by direct radioimmunoassay, including a competition
Profile of Mood States
reaction between 125iodohistamine-cortisol and anticortisol
The Profile of Mood States (POMS; McNair et al.,
serum made against the 3-CMO-BSA conjugate. Via a con-
1992) is a widely used self-report measure to quantify typical
ventional "second antibody" method, separation of free and
and persistent mood reactions to current life situations. In the
antibody-bound 125iodohistamine9 cortisol was performed
present study, subjective stress experiences were assessed
after overnight incubation of 100 L saliva at 4°C. To
using its Anger-Hostility and Tension-Anxiety subscales.
reduce sources of variability, all 4 samples from an indi-
Participants indicate to what extent they agree with adjectives
vidual were analyzed in the same assay. Mean intra- and
describing their current mood or feelings on 5-point scales
interassay coefficients of variation ranged from 4.3% to
(anchors: 0 ⫽ not at all, 4 ⫽ extremely). Adjectives include
8.3%, respectively.
2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Giesbrecht et al.
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease • Volume 195, Number 4, April 2007
Pearson Product-Moment Correlations Among the Dissociative Experiences
Scale (DES), the Dissociative Experiences Scale Taxon Total Score (DES-T), theAmnesia, Absorption, and Depersonalization Subscale of the DES, the Pre- andPostmanipulation Scores on the Anger-Hostility and the Tension Anxiety Scale of theProfile of Mood States (POMS) for an Undergraduate Sample (N ⫽ 58)*
*Only relevant correlations are shown.
†Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
scores and the DES absorption subscale. This DES subscaleaccounted for 16.97% of the variance.
The mean DES score was 16.6 (SD ⫽ 9.8). This score
corresponds to values previously reported for student samples
Cortisol responses of 1 participant were identified as
(Merckelbach et al., 2002). Mean scores for the DES-T, the
outliers and were omitted from all subsequent analyses. Mean
amnesia, absorption, and depersonalization/derealization sub-
baseline cortisol level was 3.99 nmol/L (SD ⫽ 1.82). Re-
scale were 9.1 (SD ⫽ 8.1), 11.8 (SD ⫽ 10.1), 24.1 (SD ⫽
peated measures ANOVA with the 4 measurement times as
13.6), and 7.2 (SD ⫽ 7.5), respectively.
within-subject factor revealed a significant main effect oftime 关F(3,54) ⫽ 11.48, p ⬍ 0.01兴 indicating that our manip-
Subjective Stress Experiences
ulation elicited significant physiological stress reactions (i.e.,
Mean scores on the Anger-Hostility and the Tension-
increased cortisol levels) in participants.
Anxiety POMS subscales were 1.0 (SD ⫽ 2.9) and 5.2 (SD ⫽
To quantify the cortisol response, we calculated the
2.5) obtained prior to the TSST and 2.5 (SD ⫽ 3.3) and 9.0
area under the curve with respect to increase (AUC ). This
(SD ⫽ 3.0), after the TSST, respectively. Paired samples t
parameter was calculated following the recommendations of
tests indicated that for both Anger-Hostility and Tension-
Pruessner et al. (2003). All correlations between DES and its
Anxiety, postmanipulation scores were higher than prema-
subscales, and cortisol stress response parameters fell short of
nipulation scores 关t(57) ⫽ 3.24, p ⬍ 0.01 and t(57) ⫽ 8.95,
significance (r ⬍ 0.10, p ⬎ 0.47). In addition, baseline
p ⬍ 0.01, respectively兴. This shows that our TSST manipu-
cortisol levels were unrelated to dissociation scores (r ⬍ 0.16,
lation was successful in inducing psychological stress.
p ⬎ 0.22).
Table 1 presents Pearson product–moment correlations
between DES, DES-T, and the subscales of the DES and the
POMS subscales. Dissociation was related neither to thePOMS Anger-Hostility nor to the Tension-Anxiety subscales
Our finding that dissociation is not related an attenuated
prior to the manipulation (i.e., at baseline). However, disso-
cortisol response during acute stress, i.e., TSST, is in sharp
ciation correlated positively with the Tension-Anxiety and
contrast with the proposed HPA axis dysfunction. However,
the Anger-Hostility subscale after the manipulation.
Through stepwise regression, we explored to what
extent subjective stress experiences after the TSST, as mea-
Summary of Stepwise Multiregressions on the
sured by the POMS Anger-Hostility and the Tension-Anxiety
POMS Anger-Hostility and Tension-Anxiety Subscale (Study 1;
subscales, were predicted by dissociative tendencies (DES
and its subscales, DES-T), while controlling for the respec-
tive POMS subscale prior to the TSST, age, and gender. Forthe POMS Anger-Hostility subscale, this analysis resulted in
POMS Anger-Hostility
a model that accounted for 27% (R2) of the variance (Table
POMS Anger-Hostility
2). The model included the POMS premanipulation scores
and the DES depersonalization/derealization subscale. This
DES depersonalization subscale
subscale of the DES accounted for 12.53% of the variance.
POMS Tension-Anxiety
For the POMS Tension-Anxiety subscale, this analysis re-
DES absorption subscale
sulted in a model that accounted for 25% (R2) of the variance
POMS Tension-Anxiety
(Table 2). The model included the POMS premanipulation
2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease • Volume 195, Number 4, April 2007
Dissociation and Acute Stress
due to our relatively small sample size, the aforementioned
Pearson Product-Moment Correlations Among
null findings have to be interpreted with caution and require
the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), the Dissociative
replication. Therefore, we conducted a second study, which
Experiences Scale Taxon Total Score (DES-T), the Amnesia,
parallels the procedure of study 1, while employing a modi-
Absorption, and Depersonalization Subscale of the DES,
fied version of the TSST.
Cortisol Baseline Levels, and Area Under the Curve withRespect to Increase (AUC ) for an Undergraduate Samples
(Study 2; N ⫽ 67)
A sample of 67 (33 woman) undergraduate students
enrolled at Maastricht University participated in our second
study. Their mean age was 19.70 years (SD ⫽ 1.76; range:
18 –27 years). After completion of the DES, they all under-
went our slightly modified version of the TSST. This time we
made the TSST even more stressful. During this TSST, the
job interview was replaced by a speech about their personal-
ity to make this task more personally relevant. Furthermore,
*Only relevant correlations are shown.
the difficulty of the arithmetic task was increased by having
†Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
participants solve a number of difficult subtractions. Themodified TSST was of the exact same duration as the TSSTduring study 1. Our cortisol sampling procedure closely
Summary of the Stepwise Multiple Regression on
mirrored the one employed during study 1. Subjective stress
the Glucocorticoid Stress Response, as Indexed by the Area
experiences were not measured during study 2.
Under the Curve for an Undergraduate Sample (Study 2:N ⫽ 67)
Area Under the Curve
The mean DES, DES-T, amnesia, absorption, and de-
personalization/derealization subscale scores were 22.3 (SD ⫽
11.0), 13.2 (SD ⫽ 9.3), 15.0 (SD ⫽ 11.0), 33.1 (SD ⫽ 14.9),
DES depersonalization
and 11.5 (SD ⫽ 10.7), respectively.
Mean baseline cortisol levels were 7.4 nmol/L (SD ⫽
5.9). Repeated measures ANOVA with the 4 measurementtimes as within-subject factor revealed a significant main
response, while experiences of absorption exhibited a nega-
effect 关F(3,64) ⫽ 21.51, p ⬍ 0.01兴, indicating that our
manipulation significantly increased cortisol levels.
During study 2, the cortisol responses were quantified
in the same way as in study 1. Overall, cortisol responses in
The main findings of our 2 studies can be catalogued as
study 2, as indexed by the area under the curve with respect
follows. The elevated levels of both subjective distress (study
to increase, were significantly higher than those in study 1
1) and physiological stress (both studies) showed that we
关t(122) ⫽ 3.01, p ⬍ 0.01兴. Unlike in study 1, the more
were effective in inducing acute stress by means of the TSST
pathological manifestations of dissociation, notably the
procedure used in both studies. Interestingly, individuals high
DES-T and the depersonalization/derealization subscale of
on dissociation experienced a pronounced increase in sub-
the DES, were related to the cortisol stress response, as
jective stress as measured with the Tension-Anxiety and the
indexed by the area under the curve with respect to increase
Anger-Hostility subscale of the POMS. These increases were
(Table 3). In addition, the more benign manifestation of
mainly carried by individual differences in absorption and
dissociation, absorption, was related to lowered baseline
depersonalization/derealization, respectively. Our findings
cortisol levels.
concerning the cortisol response were less straightforward. In
To index the unique influence of the various facets of
study 1, dissociation was unrelated to the cortisol stress
dissociation on the cortisol stress response, we conducted a
response. However, in study 2, which was designed to be
forward stepwise multiple regression analyses. In these anal-
more stressful than study 1, heightened levels of DES-T and
yses, the stress response, as indexed by the area under the
the depersonalization/derealization subscale of the DES were
curves served as dependent variable, while gender, age, and
positively related to the cortisol response. The subsequent
baseline cortisol levels were controlled for. Table 4 presents
regression analysis implied that this finding was due to
the summary of the multiple regressions. The analyses re-
individual differences in the frequency of depersonalization/
sulted in a model consisting of baseline cortisol levels,
derealization experiences. Moreover, this analysis signifies
gender, depersonalization/derealization, and absorption. This
that the benign manifestation of dissociation (i.e., absorption)
model accounted for 31% (R2) of the variance in the cortisol
was negatively related to the cortisol response.
stress response. Interestingly, the depersonalization/dereal-
Thus, HPA axis dysregulation is not limited to individ-
ization subscale was positively related to the cortisol stress
uals suffering from DPD (Simeon et al., 2001) but does also
2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Giesbrecht et al.
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease • Volume 195, Number 4, April 2007
occur, albeit in a milder form and under acute stress condi-
conducted along these lines might broaden our understanding
tions, in healthy individuals who report a high frequency of
of the different processes implicated in dissociation. Also our
depersonalization/derealization experiences. Interestingly, the
samples exhibited rather homogenous (i.e., low) dissociation
absorption subscale of the DES exhibited an opposite rela-
levels. Therefore, a replication of our findings in clinical
tionship with the cortisol response. Thus, while a malign
groups exhibiting severe dissociative symptoms would be
manifestation of dissociation, i.e., depersonalization/dereal-
highly informative, although ethical issues arise when using
ization, was found to be related to heightened cortisol re-
the TSST in such groups. Second, we focused on the rela-
sponses, possibly due to diminished negative HPA axis feed-
tionship between dissociative tendencies and HPA axis func-
back, absorption appeared to be related to a suppression of
tioning. Future research in this area might benefit from
cortisol responses. The finding that absorption goes along
quantifying acute (i.e., peritraumatic) dissociative responses
with a suppression of cortisol responses is in line with that of
as a response to acute stress and how it overlaps with
Morgan et al. (2004, 2001), who investigated peritraumatic
dissociation as a trait. On a related note, 2 studies have
dissociation and stress-related hormones in a sample of
investigated how peritraumatic dissociation during actual trauma
healthy military personnel participating in survival school
relates to subsequent physiological reactions to trauma narra-
training. Their data suggested that individuals who dissociate
tives. Griffin et al. (1997) reported reduced physiological
extensively during this extremely stressful experience dampen
arousal in female victims of recent rape who experienced
their peripheral stress-related physiology during acute stress
heightened levels of peritraumatic dissociation. On the con-
(see, for similar findings, Koopman et al., 2003).
trary, Nixon et al. (2005) found heightened levels of peritrau-
In study 1, we found that dissociative experiences,
matic dissociation being related to heightened responsivity in
notably their absorption and depersonalization/derealization
victims of a motor vehicle accident or physical assault (see,
components, are positively correlated with subjective distress
for similar results, Giesbrecht et al., in press; Ladwig et al.,
during acute stress, a finding which replicates the findings of
2002). Thus, both studies yielded conflicting findings. More-
Griffin et al. (1997) in their sample of traumatized women.
over, these studies did not investigate dissociation as a trait.
However, this pattern is difficult to reconcile with "the
To conclude, we found that individuals with raised
‘shut-down' symptomatology typically characteristic of dis-
dissociative levels report more subjective stress. Moreover,the benign manifestation of dissociation (i.e., absorption) was
sociative states" (Simeon et al., 2003, p. 93). Thus, the
related to decreased cortisol responses, while the malign one,
findings of Griffin et al (1997) appear not to be limited to
notably depersonalization and derealization, was related to
clinical samples, but probably represent a more general ten-
increased levels of cortisol. In more general terms, our results
dency of high dissociators to experience stressful events as
highlight the importance of HPA axis dysregulations in de-
more distressing than low dissociators. Germane to this issue
personalization and derealization experiences. In keeping
is previous research (e.g., Mulder et al., 1998) showing that
with recent work (Holmes et al., 2005), they also illustrate
dissociation levels are related to current mental disorders in
that it is important to differentiate between various types of
the general population. Thus, it might also be the case that the
dissociation because types might differentially related to
link between dissociation and subjective distress during acute
stress responses.
stress is not due to dissociation levels per se (i.e., direct), butis mediated by current psychiatric disorders (i.e., indirect).
However, as we did not quantify general psychopathology in
study 1, neither possibility can be ruled out.
Bernstein EM, Putnam FW (1986) Development, reliability and validity of a
Note that the present studies have 2 methodological
dissociation scale. J Nerv Ment Dis. 174:727–735.
Carlson EB, Putnam FW, Ross CA, Anderson G, Clark P, Torem M, Coons
limitations. First, we focused on a single physiological mea-
P, Bowman E, Chu JA, Dill D, Loewenstein RJ, Braun BG (1991) Factor
sure, namely cortisol. Of course, the cortisol response is a
analysis of the Dissociative Experiences Scale: A multicenter study. In BG
widely used and valid measure of physiological and psycho-
Braun, EB Carlson (Eds), Proceedings of the Eighth International Con-
logical stress responses (Dickerson and Kemeny, 2004).
ference on Multiple Personality and Dissociative States. Chicago: Rush.
Dickerson SS, Kemeny ME (2004) Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A
However, an interesting additional parameter would be heart
theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychol Bull.
rate, as defensive reactions are specifically associated with
heart rate acceleration (e.g., Verschuere et al., 2004). Ger-
Eisen ML, Carlson EB (1998) Individual differences in suggestibility:
mane to this issue is a study of Koopman et al. (2004)
Examining the influence of dissociation, absorption and a history ofchildhood abuse. Appl Cogn Psychol. 12:S47–S61.
showing that dissociative symptoms, notably feelings of de-
Giesbrecht T, Geraerts E, Merckelbach H Dissociation, memory commission
realization and identity alteration, in delinquent adolescents
errors and heightened autonomic reactivity. Psychiatry Res. In press.
are related to a lowered mean heart rate during a stressful
Giesbrecht T, Merckelbach H (2005) U
¨ ber die kausale Beziehung zwischen
interview. This finding led the authors to speculate that
Dissoziation und Trauma: Ein kritischer U
¨ berblick 关The causal relation
"perhaps differences in physiological responses such as heart
between dissociation and trauma: A critical review兴. Nervenarzt. 76:20–27.
Griffin MG, Resick PA, Mechanic MB (1997) Objective assessment of
rate are associated with experiencing particular dissociative
peritraumatic dissociation: Psychophysiological indicators. Am J Psychi-
symptoms rather than dissociative symptoms in general"
(Koopman et al., 2004, p. 53). Therefore, future studies
Holmes EA, Brown RJ, Mansell W, Fearon R, Hunter ECM, Frasquilho F,
should preferably look at the relationship between dissocia-
Oakley DA (2005) Are there two qualitatively distinct forms of dissoci-ation? A review and some clinical implications. Clin Psychol Rev. 25:1–23.
tive subscales and a broad range of physiological measures
Kihlstrom JF (2005) Dissociative disorders. Ann Rev Clin Psychol. 1:1–27.
including cortisol and heart rate. Psychophysiological studies
Kirschbaum C, Hellhammer DH (1994) Salivary cortisol in psychoneuroen-
2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease • Volume 195, Number 4, April 2007
Dissociation and Acute Stress
docrine research: Recent developments and applications. Psychoneuroen-
Pruessner JC, Kirschbaum C, Meinlschmid G, Hellhammer DH (2003) Two
formulas for computation of the area under the curve represent measures
Kirschbaum C, Pirke KM, Hellhammer DH (1993) The ‘Trier Social Stress
of total hormone concentration versus time-dependent change. Psychoneu-
Test': A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a
roendocrinology. 28:916 –931.
laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology. 28:76 – 81.
Ross CA, Ellason JW, Anderson G (1995) A factor analysis of the dissocia-
Koopman C, Carrison V, Butler LD, Sudhakar S, Palmer L, Steiner H (2004)
tive experieces scale (DES) in dissociative identity disorder. Dissociation.
Relationships of dissociation and childhood abuse and neglect with heart
8:229 –235.
rate in delinquent adolescents. J Trauma Stress. 17:47–54.
Ross CA, Joshi S, Currie R (1991) Dissociative experiences in the general
Koopman C, Sephton S, Abercrombie HC, Classen C, Butler LD,
population: A factor analysis. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 42:297–301.
Gore Felton C, Borggrefe A, Spiegel D (2003) Dissociative symptoms and
Sanders B, Green A (1994) The factor structure of dissociative experiences
cortisol responses to recounting traumatic experiences among childhood
in college students. Dissociation. 7:23–27.
sexual abuse survivors with PTSD. J Trauma Dissociation. 4:29 – 44.
Simeon D, Guralnik O, Knutelska M, Hollander E, Schmeidler J (2001)
Ladwig KH, Marten-Mittag B, Deisenhofer I, Hofmann B, Schapperer J,
Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation in depersonalization
Weyerbrock S, Erazo N, Schmitt C (2002) Psychophysiological correlates
of peritraumatic dissociative responses in survivors of life-threatening
Simeon D, Guralnik O, Knutelska M, Yehuda R, Schmeidler J (2003)
cardiac events. Psychopathology. 35:241–248.
关jnl兴Basal norepinephrine in depersonalization disorder. Psychiatry Res.
Leonard KN, Telch MJ, Harrington PJ (1999) Dissociation in the laboratory:
A comparison of strategies. Behav Res Ther. 37:49 – 61.
Smeets T, Jelicic M, Merckelbach H The effect of acte stress on memory
Lezak MD (2004) Profile of mood states (POMS). In MD Lezak, DB
depends on word valence. Int J Psychophysiol. In press.
Howieson, DW Loring (Eds), Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford:
Stanton BR, David AS, Cleare AJ, Sierra M, Lambert MV, Phillips ML,
Oxford University Press.
Porter RJ, Gallagher P, Young AH (2001) Basal activity of the hypotha-
McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF (1992) The Profile of Mood States
lamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in patients with depersonalization disorder.
(POMS) Manual. San Diego (CA): EDITS.
Psychiatry Res. 104:85– 89.
Merckelbach H, a Campo J, Hardy S, Giesbrecht T (2005) Dissociation and
Stein MB, Yehuda R, Koverola C, Hanna C (1997) Enhanced dexametha-
fantasy proneness in psychiatric patients: A preliminary study. Compr
sone suppression of plasma cortisol in adult women traumatized by
Merckelbach H, Horselenberg R, Schmidt H (2002) Modeling the connection
childhood sexual abuse. Biol Psychiatry. 42:680 – 686.
between self-reported trauma and dissociation in a student sample. Person
van IJzendoorn MH, Schuengel C (1996) The measurement of dissociation in
Individ Diff. 32:695–705.
normal and clinical populations: Meta-analytic validation of the Dissocia-
Morgan CA III, Southwick S, Hazlett G, Rasmusson A, Hoyt G, Zimolo Z,
tive Experience Scale (DES). Clin Psychol Rev. 16:365–382.
Charney D (2004) Relationships among plasma dehydroepiandrosterone
Verschuere B, Crombez G, Clercq A, de Ernst HW (2004) Autonomic and
sulfate and cortisol levels, symptoms of dissociation and objective perfor-
behavioral responding to concealed information: Differentiating orienting
mance in humans exposed to acute stress. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 61:819 – 825.
and defensive responses. Psychophysiology. 41:461– 466.
Morgan CA III, Wang S, Rasmusson A, Hazlett G, Anderson G, Charney DS
Wald FDM, Mellenberg GJ (1990) De verkorte versie van de Nederlandse
(2001) Relationship among plasma cortisol, catecholamines, neuropeptide
vertaling van de Profile of Mood States (POMS). 关The brief version of the
Y and human performance during exposure to uncontrollable stress.
Dutch translation of the Profile of Mood States (POMS)兴. Ned Tijdschr
Psychosom Med. 63:412– 422.
Psychol. 45:86 –90.
Mulder RT, Beautrais AL, Joyce PR, Fergusson DM (1998) Relationship
Waller NG, Putnam FW, Carlson EB (1996) Types of dissociation and
between dissociation, childhood sexual abuse and mental illness in a
dissociative types: A taxometric analysis of dissociative experiences.
general population sample. Am J Psychiatry. 155:806 – 811.
Psychol Methods. 1:300 –321.
Nixon RDV, Bryant RA, Moulds ML, Felmingham KL, Mastrodomenico JA
Yehuda R, Southwick SM, Krystal JH, Bremner D, Charney DS, Mason JW
(2005) Physiological arousal and dissociation in acute trauma victims
(1993) Enhanced suppression of cortisol following dexamethasone admin-
during trauma narratives. J Trauma Stress. 18:107–113.
istration in posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 150:83– 86.
2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Source: http://haraldmerckelbach.nl/artikelen_engels/2007/Depersonalization_Experiences_In_Undergraduates_Are_Related_To.pdf
Gemeinsame Stellungnahme zur Nutzenbewertung gemäß § 35a SGB V von Projektnummer IQWiG A15-60 IQWiG Bericht Nr. 379 vom 30. März 2016 Vorgangsnummer 2016-01-01-D-207 1. Einleitung 2. Stand des Wissens 3. Dossier und Bewertung von Sacubitril/Valsartan bei symptomatischer chronischer Herzinsuffizienz mit reduzierter Ejektionsfraktion 3.1 Zweckmäßige Vergleichstherapie 3.2 Studien 3.3 Endpunkte 3.4 Übertragbarkeit der Studiendaten auf Deutschland 3.5 Bericht des IQWiG 3.6 Ausmaß des Zusatznutzens
Reinforcement Approach William R. Miller, Ph.D., and Robert J. Meyers, M.S., with Susanne Hiller-Sturmhöfel, Ph.D. The community-reinforcement approach (CRA) is an alcoholism treatment approach thataims to achieve abstinence by eliminating positive reinforcement for drinking and enhancingpositive reinforcement for sobriety. CRA integrates several treatment components, includingbuilding the client's motivation to quit drinking, helping the client initiate sobriety, analyzingthe client's drinking pattern, increasing positive reinforcement, learning new copingbehaviors, and involving significant others in the recovery process. These components can beadjusted to the individual client's needs to achieve optimal treatment outcome. In addition,treatment outcome can be influenced by factors such as therapist style and initial treatmentintensity. Several studies have provided evidence for CRA's effectiveness in achievingabstinence. Furthermore, CRA has been successfully integrated with a variety of othertreatment approaches, such as family therapy and motivational interviewing, and has beentested in the treatment of other drug abuse. KEY WORDS: AODU (alcohol and other drug use)treatment method; reinforcement; AOD (alcohol and other drug) abstinence; motivation; AODuse pattern; AODD (alcohol and other drug dependence) recovery; treatment outcome;cessation of AODU; professional client relations; family therapy; motivational interviewing;spouse or significant other; literature review